Observational studyProblemy endokrinologii2023
[Acromegaly screening in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma].
Observational study in Problemy endokrinologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyperprolactinemia accompanies growth hormone hypersecretion in approximately 25-39% of cases. There is a recommendation to determine the level of prolactin in clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. However, there is no understanding of the necessity to investigate the IGF-1 level in patients with hyperprolactinemia and a pituitary adenoma.
aimDetermining the proportion of patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma, who were examined for IGF-1 levels, and identifying the proportion of patients with acromegaly among this cohort. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween December 2019 and December 2022 a single-center observational single-stage single-sample uncontrolled study was conducted. At the first stage of the study, the proportion of patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia with studied IGF-1 levels was determined, according to medical records. At the second stage of the study, patients without known indicators of IGF-1 were determined. The concentration of growth hormone was studied during the oral glucose load in the case of increased IGF-1 levels.
resultsAt the first stage, 105 patients were included in the study. The level of IGF-1 was determined in 41/105 (39%) cases. There were 22/41 (53.7%) cases in the subgroup with pituitary incidentalomas and 19/64 (29.7%) cases in the subgroup with hyperprolactinemia among them. At the second stage, the IGF-1 level was additionally determined in 53 patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma (total 94 patients). The level of IGF-1 was elevated in 11/94 patients, further acromegaly was confirmed in 3/94 patients (3.2%).
conclusionIn real clinical practice the level of IGF-1 is studied only in 39% of cases in patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia. The disease was detected in 3 cases (3.2%) out of 94 people with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma without clinical manifestations of acromegaly. We consider the study of IGF-1 levels justified as a screening for acromegaly in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.