Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38796721›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

A clinical risk score enables early prediction of dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.

André Strahl, Maximilian M Delsmann, Alexander Simon, Christian Ries, Tim Rolvien, Frank Timo Beil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A clinical risk score enables early prediction of dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André StrahlDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-9582
Maximilian M DelsmannDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-8982
Alexander SimonDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-8983
Christian RiesDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-2947
Tim RolvienDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-1307
Frank Timo BeilDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-1946

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a prevalent and clinically relevant problem that affects approximately 10%-20% of patients. The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with dissatisfaction 1 year after TKA.

methodsA total of 236 patients undergoing TKA were included in this prospective cohort study. Demographic data, preoperative clinical parameters (e.g., axial alignment, osteoarthritis severity) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected preoperatively, at 1 month and 1 year after TKA, encompassing the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The primary outcome was dissatisfaction 1 year after TKA, defined as ≤20 points on the KSS satisfaction scale. A risk score based on multiple regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses was calculated to predict dissatisfaction.

resultsOne year after TKA, 16% of the patients were dissatisfied. Dissatisfied patients were significantly younger (p = 0.023) and had a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.007). No differences were observed in preoperative objective (p = 0.903) and functional KSS (p = 0.346), pain (p = 0.306), osteoarthritis severity (p = 0.358), axial knee alignment (p = 0.984) or psychological distress (p = 0.138). The likelihood of dissatisfaction at 1 year was 3.0, 4.0, 7.4, 4.3 and 2.8 times higher amongst patients aged <63.5 years, with a BMI > 30.1 kg/m

conclusionDissatisfaction 1 year after TKA can be predicted by a weighted risk score that includes patient age, BMI, pain, subjective functionality and unmet expectation 1 month postoperatively. Using the risk score, early detection of dissatisfaction has the potential to enable targeted interventions and improve patients' quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsmultiple regressionprediction modelrisk scoresatisfactiontotal knee arthroplastytotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID38796721
PMCPMC11716356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.