ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
An Imaging-Compatible Oral Retractor System for Transoral Robotic Surgery.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A self-retaining mouth prop for intraoral access during periodontal surgery in rat models: A technical note.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- [Management and consideration of positive surgical margins in locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with oral robotic surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a Computed Tomography (CT)/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-compatible polymer oral retractor system to enable intraoperative image guidance for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The retractor was designed based on standard-of-care metallic retractors and 3D (three-dimensional) printed with carbon fiber composite and nylon. The system was comprehensively evaluated in bench-top and cadaveric experiments in terms of its ability to enable intraoperative CT/MR images during TORS, functionality including surgical exposure and working volume, usability, compatibility with da Vinci surgical systems, feasibility for disinfection or sterilization, and robustness over an extended period of time. The polymer retractor system enabled the acquisition of high-resolution and artifact-free intraoperative CT/MR images during TORS. With an inter-incisive distance of 42.55 mm and a working volume of 200.09 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.