Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38796667›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2024

CEACAM6 expression and function in tumor biology: a comprehensive review.

Dong Zhao, Fei Cai, Xuefei Liu, Tingting Li, Ershu Zhao, Xinlong Wang, Zhendong Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A highly penetrantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neutrophil CEACAMs and the Inflammatory Response toJournal of innate immunity · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the interactions of integrins and CEACAM6 (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dong Zhao *Department of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Fei Cai *Department of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Xuefei LiuDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Tingting LiDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Ershu ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Xinlong WangDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Zhendong ZhengDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China. gcp_zzd@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) is an immunoglobulin superfamily protein primarily expressed on epithelial surfaces and myeloid cells. It plays a significant role in cancer progression by inhibiting apoptosis, promoting drug resistance, and facilitating cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Overexpression of CEACAM6 has been observed in various cancers, including lung, breast, colorectal, and hepatocellular cancers, and is associated with poorer overall survival and disease-free survival. Its differential expression on tumor cell surfaces makes it a promising cancer marker. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of CEACAM6's role in different cancer types, its involvement in signaling pathways, and recent advancements in CEACAM6-targeted treatments.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCEACAM6Therapeutic targetTMEVaccine therapy

Identifiers

PMID38796667
PMCPMC11127906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.