Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38796619›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Comparative study on the efficacy of Conbercept and Aflibercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Hao Xie, Huan Ju, Jing Lu, Xing Wang, Hui Peng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05539235 (Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Conbercept With Modified Treat-and-Extend Regimens in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05539235 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Conbercept With Modified Treat-and-Extend Regimens in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsExudative Age-Related Macular DegenerationArmsdifferent degrees of adjustment of the injection interval
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao Xie *Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Youyi Road, Chongqing, China.
Huan Ju *Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Youyi Road, Chongqing, China.
Jing LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Youyi Road, Chongqing, China.
Xing WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Youyi Road, Chongqing, China. fancy_mm@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7345-7269
Hui PengDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1, Youyi Road, Chongqing, China. pengh9@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4758-3752

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China financially supported this study 81670881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of Conbercept and Aflibercept in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University's Ophthalmology Department (May 2020-May 2023), this prospective study enrolled 159 nAMD patients. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving 0.5 mg Conbercept and the other 2 mg Aflibercept intravitreal injections. Over 12 months, the study, employing a Treat-and-Extend (T&E) regimen, assessed Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) changes and injection frequency. Of the 159 patients, 137 (149 eyes) completed the study. No significant age difference was found between the groups (P = 0.331). After 12 months, BCVA improved similarly in both groups (Conbercept: 52.8 ± 18.9, Aflibercept: 52.0 ± 19.7 letters; P = 0.820). CRT reduction was also comparable (Conbercept: 246.3 ± 82.8 µm, Aflibercept: 275.9 ± 114.3 µm; P = 0.079). Injection frequencies averaged 6.9 ± 0.7 (Conbercept) and 6.7 ± 0.7 (Aflibercept; P = 0.255). Subtype analysis revealed Type 1 MNV had higher baseline BCVA and lower CRT, with more frequent injections compared to other types. Both Conbercept and Aflibercept are clinically similar in efficacy for nAMD, with the T&E regimen proving therapeutically effective and potentially reducing patient costs. Anti-VEGF treatment efficacy varies across nAMD subtypes, indicating a potential benefit in tailored treatments for specific subtypes.Clinical trial registration number NCT05539235 (Protocol Registration and Results System).

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsKH902 fusion proteinReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAfliberceptConberceptEfficacy comparisonNeovascular age-related macular degenerationReceptor fusion proteins drugs

Identifiers

PMID38796619
PMCPMC11128006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.