ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Development of a 3D-printed nuchal translucency model: a pilot study for prenatal ultrasound training.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical student training with next-generation handheld ultrasound devices - hands on examination of fetal biometry in obstetrics.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe used two 3D ultrasound volumes of fetal heads at 13 weeks to create live-size 3D-printed phantoms with a view to training or assessment of diagnostic abilities for normal and abnormal nuchal translucency measurements. The phantoms are suitable for use in a water bath, imitating a real-life exam. They were then used to study measurement accuracy and reproducibility in examiners of different skill levels.
methodsUltrasound scans of a 13 + 0-week fetus were processed using 3D Slicer software, producing a stereolithography file for 3D printing. The model, crafted in Autodesk Fusion360™, adhered to FMF guidelines for NT dimensions (NT 2.3 mm). Additionally, a model with pathologic NT was designed (NT 4.2 mm). Printing was performed via Formlabs Form 3® printer using High Temp Resin V2. The externally identical looking 3D models were embedded in water-filled condoms for ultrasound examination. Eight specialists of varying expertise levels conducted five NT measurements for each model, classifying them in physiological and abnormal models.
resultsClassification of the models in physiological or abnormal NT resulted in a detection rate of 100%. Average measurements for the normal NT model and the increased NT model were 2.27 mm (SD ± 0.38) and 4.165 mm (SD ± 0.51), respectively. The interrater reliability was calculated via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) which yielded a result of 0.883, indicating robust agreement between the raters. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated the economical nature of the 3D printing process. DISCUSSION: This study underscores the potential of 3D printed fetal models for enhancing ultrasound training through high inter-rater reliability, consistency across different expert levels, and cost-effectiveness. Limitations, including population variability and direct translation to clinical outcomes, warrant further exploration. The study contributes to ongoing discussions on integrating innovative technologies into medical education, offering a practical and economical method to acquire, refine and revise diagnostic skills in prenatal ultrasound. Future research should explore broader applications and long-term economic implications, paving the way for transformative advancements in medical training and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.