Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38796491›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Synergizing habits and goals with variational Bayes.

Dongqi Han, Kenji Doya, Dongsheng Li, Jun Tani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dongqi HanMicrosoft Research Asia, Shanghai, 200232, China. dongqihan@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6872-7121
Kenji DoyaOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2446-6820
Dongsheng LiMicrosoft Research Asia, Shanghai, 200232, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-8442
Jun TaniOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-9206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaving efficiently and flexibly is crucial for biological and artificial embodied agents. Behavior is generally classified into two types: habitual (fast but inflexible), and goal-directed (flexible but slow). While these two types of behaviors are typically considered to be managed by two distinct systems in the brain, recent studies have revealed a more sophisticated interplay between them. We introduce a theoretical framework using variational Bayesian theory, incorporating a Bayesian intention variable. Habitual behavior depends on the prior distribution of intention, computed from sensory context without goal-specification. In contrast, goal-directed behavior relies on the goal-conditioned posterior distribution of intention, inferred through variational free energy minimization. Assuming that an agent behaves using a synergized intention, our simulations in vision-based sensorimotor tasks explain the key properties of their interaction as observed in experiments. Our work suggests a fresh perspective on the neural mechanisms of habits and goals, shedding light on future research in decision making.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGoalsHabitsBrainDecision MakingHumansIntention

Identifiers

PMID38796491
PMCPMC11525633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.