Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38796438›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Self-study and online interactive case-based discussion to improve knowledge of medical students in the COVID-19 era.

Maliwan Oofuvong, Sumidtra Prathep, Prae Plansangkate, Jutarat Tanasansuttiporn, Chutida Sungworawongpana, Wilasinee Jitpakdee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maliwan OofuvongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Road, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand. oomaliwa@gmail.com.
Sumidtra PrathepDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Road, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Prae PlansangkateDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Road, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Jutarat TanasansuttipornDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Road, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Chutida SungworawongpanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Road, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Wilasinee JitpakdeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Road, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University REC 65-047-08-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to determine whether a new online interactive learning method for fifth-year medical students could improve their knowledge of pre- and postoperative care during the COVID-19 era.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted from June 2020 to May 2022 during the pre- and postoperative care course for fifth-year medical students in a university hospital in southern Thailand. Students in the 2020 cohort received only a 60-minute lecture on spinal anesthesia via Zoom while a 3-step online interactive learning method was used for the 2021 cohort. Step 1: students performed self-study comprised of video lectures and case-based discussion one week before the online class with a pre-test submitted via Google forms. Step 2: an online interactive case-based discussion class was performed via Zoom by two experienced anesthesia staff and a post-test was submitted by the students via Google forms. Step 3: a small group discussion of course evaluation between 13 representatives of students and anesthesia staff was performed via Zoom. A comparison of the post-test and pre-test scores containing 20 multiple choice questions as well as the final exam scores before (2020) and after (2021) the new interactive learning was performed using a t-test.

resultsThere were 136 and 117 students in the 2020 and 2021 academic years, respectively. The final mean (SD) exam scores for the 2020 and 2021 academic years were 70.3 (8.4) and 72.5 (9.0), respectively with a mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) difference of 2.2 (4.3, -0.02). In 2021, the mean (95% CI) difference between the post-test and pre-test scores was 5.8 (5.1, 6.5). The student representatives were satisfied with the new learning method and gave insightful comments, which were subsequently implemented in the 2022 academic year course.

conclusionThe new interactive learning method improved the knowledge of fifth-year medical students attending pre- and postoperative care course during the COVID-19 era. The final exam scores may not be suitable to represent the overall outcomes of the new interactive learning method. Using an online two-way communication method can improve the overall satisfaction and course adaptation during the COVID-19 era.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMalePandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2ThailandCOVID-19 eraKnowledge domainMedical studentsOnline interactive case-based discussionSelf-study

Identifiers

PMID38796438
PMCPMC11128110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.