Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795317›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2024

UK national newspapers' representation of cancer patients and their care during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic: Invoking and undermining solidarity?

Betsy Barkas, Anne Kerr, Gavin Hawkton, Clare Kish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Betsy BarkasSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-5259-9468
Anne KerrSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Gavin HawktonSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Clare KishSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104832/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic media narratives of solidarity often cast nations like the UK as if at war, while acclaiming health-care workers as heroic and beloved. However, this solidarity was often fragile and fleeting, as concerns and criticism about workers, citizens and services also circulated. In this article we explore these dynamics of solidarity in more depth, analysing framings of cancer patient suffering, private and public provision of health care in news media during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic. We explore how cancer patients were positioned as victims of failure and abandonment by the state and its health-care providers, and how the private health-care system was presented in a saviour role. We conclude by reflecting on the implications of new media's alignment of appeals to solidarity with highly individualised forms of care and the consequences for state-based services founded on principles of solidarity.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsNewspapers as TopicSARS-CoV-2Delivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsUnited KingdomcancerCOVID‐19mediaNational Health Service (NHS)solidarity

Identifiers

PMID38795317
PMCPMC11587823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.