ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Construction and validation of nomogram prognostic model for predicting survival in hepatoblastoma patients: a population-based study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated machine learning and multi-dataset analysis identify SDS as a diagnostic and immune-related hub gene in hepatoblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For patients with hepatoblastoma (HB), current staging system is not accurate in predicting survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop two accurate survival prediction models to guide clinical decision making. A retrospective analysis of 424 HB patients was performed from 2004 to 2015 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for variables. The identified variables were used to build survival prediction model. The performance of the nomogram models was assessed based on the concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The Cox regression analysis identified six variables affecting overall survival (OS) in HB patients, including race, tumor size, lymph node involvement, distant metastases, surgery and chemotherapy. And the Cox regression analysis identified five variables including race, lymph node involvement, distant metastases, surgery, and chemotherapy that affect cancer-specific survival (CCS) in HB patients. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram in predicting the OS was 0.791 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 0.717-0.865], CSS was 0.805(95% CI 0.728-0.882). In the validation cohort, the C-index of the nomogram in predicting the OS was 0.712 (95% CI 0.511-0.913), the CSS was 0.751 (95% CI 0.566-0.936). In the training cohort, the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) values of the nomogram in prediction of the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.842 (95% CI 0.739-0.944), 0.759 (95% CI 0.670-0.849), and 0.770 (95% CI 0.686-0.852), respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUC values for prediction of the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.920 (95% CI 0.806-1.034), 0.863 (95% CI 0.750-0.976), and 0.844 (95% CI 0.721-0.967), respectively. Two nomogram models were developed and validated in this study which provided accurate prediction of the OS and CSS in HB patients. The constructed models can be used for predicting survival outcomes and guide treatment for HB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38795309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.