Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795207›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024

Sunscreen use and affordability attitudes based on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and Fitzpatrick skin type.

Lori E Ullman, Mehr Nasir-Moin, Victoria Hoffman, Sarah Ghadersohi, Isaac Swartzman, Malaika de Weever, Michael Augustin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. What's New in Photoprotection?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lori E UllmanDepartment of Dermatology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. alnote@verizon.net.
Mehr Nasir-MoinJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Victoria HoffmanJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Sarah GhadersohiJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Isaac SwartzmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4150 V St, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Malaika de WeeverJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Michael AugustinJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceOne in five Americans will develop skin cancer during their lifetime. While use of sunscreen can help prevent the development cutaneous cancer, regular use remains low nationwide.

objectiveTo assess and better understand health care consumer preferences for sun protection products and perceived product accessibility and availability based on socioeconomic factors, race, and ethnicity.

designThis quantitative survey study was conducted March through June of 2023.

settingParticipants were recruited from two university family medicine clinical sites in the Buffalo, New York area, one located in a low and one located in a middle-to-upper socioeconomic neighborhood.

participantsEligible participants were 18 years or older, fluent in English, and residents of the Buffalo, New York area. Surveys and consent forms were distributed by scripted verbal invitation, inviting all clinic patients who met eligibility criteria to participate. Participants were asked to self-report their racial/ethnic group as well as other demographic information including age, gender identification, household income, and household size. Information regarding sun exposure behaviors, and affordability/access was obtained using a combination of multiple choice and yes/no questions. A total of 405 participants were recruited. After excluding 235 incomplete responses, 170 surveys were available for analysis.

interventionsNone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Our study aim was to expose health care consumer preferences as well as barriers to access based on socioeconomic factors, race, and ethnicity.

resultsUsing a 25-question anonymous survey, 405 participants from two university family medicine clinical sites representing low- and middle-to-high-income neighborhoods, participated in the survey. 170 participants completed the survey questions and were included for analysis. Of those, 61.8% identified as female, 37.6% as male, and 0.6% as other. 51.2% of participants identified as lower income, 38.2% as middle-income, and 10.6% as upper income. The results of the survey revealed disparities in sunscreen use and affordability perceptions across demographic groups. Compared with Hispanics, Caucasians exhibited higher rates of sunscreen use (85 Caucasians, 7 Hispanics; p = 0.0073), prioritized SPF (95 Caucasians, 10 Hispanics; p = 0.0178), and were more likely to perceive sunscreen as unaffordable (6 Caucasians, 4 Hispanics; p = 0.0269). Analysis by Fitzpatrick Skin Type demonstrated differences in sunscreen utilization, with Types I-III using more compared to Types IV-VI (70 Types I-III, 51 Types IV-VI; p = 0.0173); additionally, Type I-III individuals were significantly more likely to cite cost as barrier to sunscreen purchase (40 Type I-III, 65 Types IV-VI; p < 0.0001). Moreover, lower-income individuals were significantly more likely to perceive sunscreen as unaffordable (12 lower-income, 1 middle & upper income; p = 0.0025) and cited cost as a barrier to purchase (46 lower-income, 59 middle & upper income; p = 0.0146) compared to middle-to-upper income counterparts. Though statistical significance was not established, respondents from middle & upper income groups reported higher sunscreen usage rates compared with their lower-income peers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings highlight the importance of socioeconomic factors and ethnicity on accessibility to sunscreen and the impact of disparities in utilization among different ethnic and socioeconomic groups.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsSocial ClassSunscreening AgentsAdolescentAdultAgedEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkSkin PigmentationSocioeconomic FactorsSunscreening AgentsAffordabilityAvailabilityBarriersSkin cancer preventionSocioeconomic statusSunscreen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.