Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795147›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Real-world evaluation of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: a retrospective multi-center study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

Arif Akyildiz, Deniz Can Guven, Baris Koksal, Beliz Bahar Karaoglan, Derya Kivrak, Rashad Ismayilov, Firat Aslan, Osman Sutcuoglu, Ozan Yazici, Ahmet Kadioglu and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Arif AkyildizDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey. drakyildizarif@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-2076
Deniz Can GuvenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Baris KoksalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Beliz Bahar KaraoglanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Derya KivrakDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Rashad IsmayilovDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Firat AslanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Medical Park Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Osman SutcuogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ozan YaziciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet KadiogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ozkan AlanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nargiz MajidovaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marmara University, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mert ErciyestepeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erkan OzcanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Goncagul AkdagDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Science, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakan TabanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Ali Osman KayaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Biruni University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Murad GuliyevDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nilgun YildirimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Firat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey.
Teoman SakalarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Dogan YazilitasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Caglar UnalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sercan OnDepartment of Oncology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Sedat BiterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Nebi Serkan DemirciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Filiz Cay SenlerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Yasemin KemalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Altinbas University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Omer Diker HalilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Near East University Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Ibrahim GulluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Sercan AksoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHead and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a significant global health concern due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite therapeutic advances, the prognosis for advanced or recurrent cases remains challenging. Nivolumab obtained approval for recurrent or metastatic HNC based on the Phase III CheckMate 141 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal HNC.

designIn this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed 124 patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC who received nivolumab in the second-line setting and beyond. Data were collected from 20 different cancer centers across Turkey. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment and survival outcomes were evaluated.

resultsNivolumab exhibited favorable clinical responses, yielding an objective response rate of 29.9% and a disease control rate of 55.7%. Safety assessments revealed a generally well-tolerated profile, with no instances of treatment discontinuation or mortality due to side effects. Survival analysis disclosed a median overall survival (OS) of 11.8 (95% CI 8.4-15.2) months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG-PS ≥ 1 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.045), laryngeal location (HR: 0.531, p = 0.024), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.5 (HR: 1.97, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of OS.

conclusionsNivolumab is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC in real-world settings. Further studies are needed on factors affecting response to treatment and survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTurkeyAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumabHead and neck cancerNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID38795147
PMCPMC11393150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.