Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795120›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

End of induction [

Luca Guerra, Stephane Chauvie, Federico Fallanca, Fabrizio Bergesio, Luigi Marcheselli, Rexhep Durmo, Simona Peano, Antonella Franceschetto, Lavinia Monaco, Emiliano Barbieri and 28 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02063685 (A Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Response-adapted Strategy to Define Maintenance After Standard Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Advanced-stage Follicular Lymphoma.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02063685 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Response-adapted Strategy to Define Maintenance After Standard Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Advanced-stage Follicular Lymphoma.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Italiana Linfomi - ETSRan2012 to 2021Enrolled807ConditionsFollicular Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaArmsR-CHOP or R-bendamustine, Observation, Maintenance weekly x4, Ibritumomab Tiuxetan + Maintenance, Standard Maintenance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Assessing the intracranial metabolic score as a novel prognostic tool in primary CNS lymphoma with end of induction-chemotherapyCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Luca GuerraNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy. luca.guerra@unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-2060
Stephane ChauvieMedical Physics, Ospedale Santa Croce E Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Federico FallancaNuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio BergesioMedical Physics, Ospedale Santa Croce E Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Luigi MarcheselliFondazione Italiana Linfomi, Modena, Italy.
Rexhep DurmoNuclear Medicine, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Simona PeanoNuclear Medicine Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce E Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Antonella FranceschettoNuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Lavinia MonacoNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Emiliano BarbieriClinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena E Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Marco LadettoHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy.
Gerardo MusuracaHematology and HSC Transplantation, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy.
Patrizia TosiHematology Unit, AUSL Della Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
Benedetta BianchiHematology Unit, Ospedale Di Circolo E Fondazione Macchi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Silvia Anna Maria BolisHematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Vincenzo PavoneHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Ospedale C. Panico, Tricase, Italy.
Annalisa ChiarenzaHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, AOU Policlinico S. Marco, Catania, Italy.
Annalisa ArcariHematology Unit, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy.
Catello CalifanoHematology Unit, Ospedale Andrea Tortora, Pagani, Italy.
Alessia BariOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Massimo MassaiaHematology Unit, Ospedale Santa Croce E Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Annarita ConconiHematology Unit, Ospedale Degli Infermi, Biella, Italy.
Pellegrino MustoHematology and Stem Cells Transplantation, IRCCS CROB, Rionero in Vulture, Italy.
Donato ManninaHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Papardo, Messina, Italy.
Giovanni RotiHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Sara GalimbertiHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Guido GiniHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Flavio FalcinelliHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Umberto VitoloHematology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Sara Veronica UsaiHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Ospedale Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.
Piero Maria StefaniHematology Unit, General Hospital Ca' Foncello, Treviso, Italy.
Adalberto IbaticiEmatologia E Terapie Cellulari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Anna Marina LiberatiUniversità Degli Studi Di Perugia, A.O. Terni, Terni, Italy.
Elsa PenneseHematology Unit, ASL Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
Tommasina PerroneHematology and Stem Cells Transplantation, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy.
Annibale VersariNuclear Medicine, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Stefano LuminariHematology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)

Funding

Ministero della Salute Bando Progetti di Ricerca Giovani Ricercatori-Ricerca Finalizzata 2011-2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the reliability of the Deauville score (DS) in therapy response assessment and to define the prognostic value of the metabolic response of end of induction (EOI) [

methodsAdult patients with untreated grade 1-3a FL/ stage II-IV enrolled in the multicentre, prospective, phase III FOLL12 trial (NCT02063685) were randomized to receive standard immunochemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance (standard arm) versus standard immunochemotherapy followed by response-adapted post-induction management (experimental arm). Baseline and EOI PET were mandatory for the study. All PET scans were centralized on the WIDEN® platform and classified according to DS in a blind independent central review. DS1-3 was considered negative (CMR), whereas DS4-5 was considered positive (not CMR). The primary endpoint was PFS. The main secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

resultsOverall, 807 follicular lymphoma patients-52% women, 89% stage III-IV disease, 40% with a high-risk FLIPI-2 score (3-5)-were enrolled in the study; 729 (90.4%) baseline and EOI PET were available for the analysis. EOI PET was positive (DS4-5) in 88/729 (12.1%) cases. Overall inter-reviewer agreement on PET pos/neg result was 0.92, while agreement on positive and negative cases was 0.77 and 0.94, respectively. The median follow-up was 69 months; 247 events were registered in the 5-yr follow-up, with a 5-yr PFS of 67% (95%CI: 63%-70%). The 5-yr PFS rate for PET neg (DS1-3) and PET pos (DS4-5) patients was 71% (95%CI: 67%-75%) and 36% (95%CI: 25%-46%), respectively, with HR 3.49 (95%CI: 2.57-4.72). Five-year PFS was worse as DS increased, with 74% (70%-78%), 58% (48%-67%; HR 1.71; p = 0.001)] and 36% (25%-46%; HR 3.88; p < 0.001) in DS1-2, DS3 and DS4-5, respectively. EOI PET maintained its prognostic value in both the standard and experimental arms. In the whole population, 5-yr OS was 94% (95%CI: 92%-96%), with 96% (95%CI: 94-97) and 82% (95%CI: 72%-89%) in EOI PET negative (DS1-3) and positive (DS4-5), respectively (HR 4.48; p < 0.001). When DS was associated with FLIPI-2, patients with DS3 or DS1-2 with high FLIPI-2 (3-5) experienced worse OS than patients with DS1-2 and low FLIPI-2 (1-2) (p = 0.003).

conclusionThis study shows that DS is a reliable prognostic tool to evaluate EOI PET in follicular lymphoma patients, with prognostic value maintained both in the standard and experimental arms, making metabolic imaging a robust tool to assess response in FL. Moreover, although preliminary, this study provides further information on DS3 patients, who are considered as CMR but show a less favourable PFS than DS1-2 patients.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Lymphoma, FollicularPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals[18F]FDG PET/CTFOLL12 trialFollicular lymphomaPrognosisTherapy response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.