Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795100›Full record

ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2024

Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Among Older Adults in the United States: A Nationwide Study.

Enrico G Ferro, Matthew R Reynolds, Jiaman Xu, Yang Song, David J Cohen, Rishi K Wadhera, Andre d'Avila, Peter J Zimetbaum, Robert W Yeh, Daniel B Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. The Global Impact of Atrial Fibrillation.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Enrico G FerroRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew R ReynoldsLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
Jiaman XuRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yang SongRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David J CohenDepartment of Cardiology, St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Rishi K WadheraRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andre d'AvilaRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter J ZimetbaumRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Robert W YehRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel B KramerRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: dkramer@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

Use of Registries, Claims and Health System Data to Enhance the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Therapies in Clinical TrialsR01HL136708 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Issa J. Dahabreh, Robert Yeh · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
Using Claims-Based Signatures of Frailty to Support Individualized Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Coronary Artery DiseaseK24HL150321 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Robert Yeh · 2020 to 2026
$862k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL150321NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly recommended as first-line therapy for atrial fibrillation. Recent data suggest growing PVI volumes but rising complication rates, although comprehensive real-world outcomes including both inpatient and outpatient encounters remain unclear.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate patient characteristics, population rates, and 30-day outcomes of PVI in a nationwide sample of U.S. adults aged >65 years.

methodsFirst-time PVIs were identified among U.S. Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using Current Procedural Terminology procedural codes. Comorbidities were ascertained using International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision diagnosis codes associated with each procedural claim. Outcomes included periprocedural complications, all-cause hospitalizations, and mortality at 30 days.

resultsFrom January 2017 through December 2021, a total of 227,133 patients underwent PVI (mean age 72.5 years, 42% women, 92.7% White) with an increasing comorbidity burden over time. PVI volume increased from 83.8 (2017) to 111.6 per 100,000 patient-years (2021), which was driven by outpatient procedures (87.8% of all PVIs). Concurrently, there was a significant decrease in complication rates (3.9% in 2017 vs 3.1% in 2021; P < 0.001) and hospitalizations (8.8% vs 7.0%; P < 0.001), with no significant change in mortality (0.4%; P = 0.08). The most common periprocedural complications were bleeding (1.8%), pericardial effusion (1.4%), and vascular access damage (0.8%).

conclusionsThe use of PVI has steadily increased among older patients in contemporary U.S. clinical practice; yet, cumulative complication and hospitalization rates at 30 days have decreased over time, with stably low rates of short-term mortality despite rising comorbidity burden among treated patients. These data may reassure patients and providers on the safety of PVI as an increasingly common first-line procedure for atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicarePostoperative ComplicationsPulmonary VeinsTreatment OutcomeUnited Statesablationatrial fibrillationoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID38795100
PMCPMC11283638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.