Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38795065›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

WeSA: a web server for improving analysis of affinity proteomics data.

Magdalena M Shtetinska, Juan-Carlos González-Sánchez, Tina Beyer, Karsten Boldt, Marius Ueffing, Robert B Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena M ShtetinskaBioQuant, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-0769-1190
Juan-Carlos González-SánchezBioQuant, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Tina BeyerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Karsten BoldtInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Marius UeffingInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Robert B RussellBioQuant, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-4717

Funding

Horizon 2020 project PrecisionTox 965 406Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN) 861 329Swedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction experiments still yield many false positive interactions. The socioaffinity metric can distinguish true protein-protein interactions from noise based on available data. Here, we present WeSA (Weighted SocioAffinity), which considers large datasets of interaction proteomics data (IntAct, BioGRID, the BioPlex) to score human protein interactions and, in a statistically robust way, flag those (even from a single experiment) that are likely to be false positives. ROC analysis (using CORUM-PDB positives and Negatome negatives) shows that WeSA improves over other measures of interaction confidence. WeSA shows consistently good results over all datasets (up to: AUC = 0.93 and at best threshold: TPR = 0.84, FPR = 0.11, Precision = 0.98). WeSA is freely available without login (wesa.russelllab.org). Users can submit their own data or look for organized information on human protein interactions using the web server. Users can either retrieve available information for a list of proteins of interest or calculate scores for new experiments. The server outputs either pre-computed or updated WeSA scores for the input enriched with information from databases. The summary is presented as a table and a network-based visualization allowing the user to remove those nodes/edges that the method considers spurious.

Indexed as

InternetProtein Interaction MappingProteomicsSoftwareDatabases, ProteinHumans

Identifiers

PMID38795065
PMCPMC11223876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.