Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38794775›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Pilot-Study to Explore Metabolic Signature of Type 2 Diabetes: A Pipeline of Tree-Based Machine Learning and Bioinformatics Techniques for Biomarkers Discovery.

Fatma Hilal Yagin, Fahaid Al-Hashem, Irshad Ahmad, Fuzail Ahmad, Abedalrhman Alkhateeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatma Hilal YaginDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44280, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-7958
Fahaid Al-HashemDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-9966
Irshad AhmadDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-9207
Fuzail AhmadDepartment of Respiratory Care, College of Applied Sciences, Almaarefa University, Diriya, Riyadh 13713, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1189-2206
Abedalrhman AlkhateebDepartment of Computer Science, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1751-7570

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia RGP - 2/286/44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to identify unique metabolomics biomarkers associated with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and develop an accurate diagnostics model using tree-based machine learning (ML) algorithms integrated with bioinformatics techniques.

methodsUnivariate and multivariate analyses such as fold change, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and Partial Least-Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) were used to identify biomarker metabolites that showed significant concentration in T2D patients. Three tree-based algorithms [eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost)] that demonstrated robustness in high-dimensional data analysis were used to create a diagnostic model for T2D.

resultsAs a result of the biomarker discovery process validated with three different approaches, Pyruvate, D-Rhamnose, AMP, pipecolate, Tetradecenoic acid, Tetradecanoic acid, Dodecanediothioic acid, Prostaglandin E3/D3 (isobars), ADP and Hexadecenoic acid were determined as potential biomarkers for T2D. Our results showed that the XGBoost model [accuracy = 0.831, F1-score = 0.845, sensitivity = 0.882, specificity = 0.774, positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.811, negative-PV (NPV) = 0.857 and Area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.887] had the slight highest performance measures.

conclusionsML integrated with bioinformatics techniques offers accurate and positive T2D candidate biomarker discovery. The XGBoost model can successfully distinguish T2D based on metabolites.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComputational BiologyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningMetabolomicsAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsROC CurveBiomarkersbioinformaticsbiomarker discoverymachine learningmetabolomicstype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38794775
PMCPMC11124278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.