Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38794692›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Health Prompts Affect Consideration of Health but Not Intertemporal Preferences While Promoting Healthier Food Choices.

Olivier Tuyizere, Christopher R Gustafson, Devin J Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivier TuyizereDepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Christopher R GustafsonDepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6894-9456
Devin J RoseDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1333-6318

Funding

University of Nebraska-Lincoln ARD Wheat Innovation Fund NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet-related diseases impact populations across the globe. While intertemporal preferences-a fundamental preference for the distribution of benefits across time-have been used to explain low-quality food choices, the recent literature proposes another cause: inattention to the future implications (or opportunity costs) of the options faced. Food choices tend to become habitual to conserve cognitive resources, rather than carefully modeling future health impacts. Both low discount rates for future benefits and attention to future health impacts predict healthier decisions. While intertemporal preferences are stable, attention may provide an opportunity to intervene in the decision process to promote healthier decisions. In this study, we test the impact of a simple message that highlights health during food choice on the healthiness of the foods chosen and on health consideration and intertemporal preferences. Our results show that actively considering health outcomes and lower discount rates lead to healthier food choices. We find that messaging increases the consideration of health outcomes during food choice but does not affect intertemporal preferences, suggesting that simple prompts may be an effective way to promote decisions balancing short- and long-term benefits by drawing attention to the overlooked opportunity costs of choices.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDiet, HealthyFood PreferencesAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleYoung Adultactive health considerationfood choicehealth promotionintertemporal preferencesnutritionpoint-of-decision prompt

Identifiers

PMID38794692
PMCPMC11123726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.