Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38794664›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2024

Assessing the Healthfulness of University Food Environments: A Systematic Review of Methods and Tools.

Alicia Anne Dahl, Stacy M Fandetti, Lilian O Ademu, Ryan Harris, Elizabeth F Racine

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicia Anne DahlDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-0926
Stacy M FandettiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5349-6749
Lilian O AdemuInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, Texas A&M University, El Paso, TX 79927, USA.
Ryan HarrisJ. Murrey Atkins Library, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3322-1371
Elizabeth F RacineTexas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, Texas A&M University, El Paso, TX 79927, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability, promotion, and price of healthy foods within the university food environment may impact students' dietary choices. This systematic review summarizes the tools and methods used to assess the healthfulness of university food environments where many students spend a significant portion of their emerging adulthood. Thirty-six global studies published between 2012 and 2022 were sourced from PubMed (NNLM), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINHAL Complete (EBSCO), ProQuest Nursing, and Allied Health, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of the included studies, 58% were institutional-level audits, 17% examined individual-level perceptions, and 25% combined both. Most institutional-level audits focused on one aspect of the food environment (e.g., eateries, vending machines). For studies examining multiple spaces within the campus environment (38%), comprehensive assessments were limited, and most studies had to employ a combination of assessment tools. Surveys were most often used to gather individual perceptions about the food environment. The Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) was the most commonly used tool across all studies. This review highlights the need for a standardized tool, method, or a "healthy" benchmark for specific use at universities to improve methodological rigor and comparability of findings across institutions.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyStudentsEnvironmentFood PreferencesFood ServicesHumansUniversitiesaccess to healthy foodsassessmentemerging adultsfood environmentfood servicesfood supplymeasurementsocial ecological modeluniversity students

Identifiers

PMID38794664
PMCPMC11123862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.