ArticlePolymers2024
Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of GelMA Hydrogels with Culture Medium: Balancing Printability, Rheology and Cell Viability for Tissue Regeneration.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printing of Magnetoactive Gelatin-Alginate Scaffolds.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials: Integrated Translational Ecosystems, Process-Structure-Property Interactions and Emerging Paradigms for Next-Generation Biomedical Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- 3D triply periodic minimal surface gyroid hydrogel scaffolds for soft tissue engineering.Nature communications · 2026Article
- 3D Bioprinted Natural Hydrogels: Rheological Characterization, Cytotoxicity, and Printability Assessment of a Polysaccharide-Based Bioink.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Task-specific computational fluid dynamics evaluation of multi-outlet extrusion nozzles for bioprinting.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Narrative and Critical Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Novel GelMA/GelMA-AEMA Hydrogel Blend with Enhanced Printability as a Carrier for iPSC-Derived Chondrocytes In Vitro.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Predicting and Optimizing Polymer Printability for 3D Bioprinting.Polymers · 2025Review
- The Use of Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) in Cartilage Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Study of Printable and Biocompatible Alginate-Carbon Hydrogels for Sensor Applications: Mechanical, Electrical, and Cytotoxicity Evaluation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimising Bioprinting Nozzles through Computational Modelling and Design of Experiments.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional extrusion bioprinting technology aims to become a fundamental tool for tissue regeneration using cell-loaded hydrogels. These biomaterials must have highly specific mechanical and biological properties that allow them to generate biosimilar structures by successive layering of material while maintaining cell viability. The rheological properties of hydrogels used as bioinks are critical to their printability. Correct printability of hydrogels allows the replication of biomimetic structures, which are of great use in medicine, tissue engineering and other fields of study that require the three-dimensional replication of different tissues. When bioprinting cell-loaded hydrogels, a small amount of culture medium can be added to ensure adequate survival, which can modify the rheological properties of the hydrogels. GelMA is a hydrogel used in bioprinting, with very interesting properties and rheological parameters that have been studied and defined for its basic formulation. However, the changes that occur in its rheological parameters and therefore in its printability, when it is mixed with the culture medium necessary to house the cells inside, are unknown. Therefore, in this work, a comparative study of GelMA 100% and GelMA in the proportions 3:1 (GelMA 75%) and 1:1 (GelMA 50%) with culture medium was carried out to determine the printability of the gel (using a device of our own invention), its main rheological parameters and its toxicity after the addition of the medium and to observe whether significant differences in cell viability occur. This raises the possibility of its use in regenerative medicine using a 3D extrusion bioprinter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.