ArticlePolymers2024
Identification of Damping of Spruce Wood (
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The damping of spruce wood is analysed at different moisture content levels for the first three vibration modes of tangentially and radially vibrating samples. Two methods were used to determine the damping. The first was the vibration envelope fitting as an improved version of the well-known logarithmic decrement, and the second was the newer and recently increasingly used wavelet transform. Both methods showed that the damping of spruce wood first decreases and then increases with moisture content, with the damping in the first vibration mode being about 9% higher in the radial direction than in the tangential direction. In the second and third vibration modes, the damping in the tangential direction was higher than in the radial direction by about 10% and 8.8%, respectively. The measured damping factors from the envelope fitting had, on average, 15.9% higher values than those from the wavelet transform. It can be concluded from the results that the wavelet transform is more accurate for determining the damping factor, as it enables the decoupling of multi-degree of freedom systems if mode coupling is present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.