Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38794260›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2024

A Two-Way Proposal for the Determination of Bioequivalence for Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs in the European Union.

Paulo Paixao, Alfredo Garcia Arieta, Nuno Silva, Zvonimir Petric, Milton Bonelli, José Augusto Guimarães Morais, Kevin Blake, Luís Filipe Gouveia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Comparison of BeiyiFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paulo PaixaoResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-4840
Alfredo Garcia ArietaMethodology Working Party of the EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-6973
Nuno SilvaResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9478-0110
Zvonimir PetricResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-8605
Milton BonelliEuropean Medicines Agency, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6778-4266
José Augusto Guimarães MoraisResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal.
Kevin BlakeEuropean Medicines Agency, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luís Filipe GouveiaResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5611-0047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the European Union, bioequivalence (BE) for narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drugs is currently demonstrated when the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the population geometric means of the test and reference products for AUC, and in some cases for Cmax, falls within the acceptance range of 90.00% to 111.11%. However, meeting this requirement results in an increased difficulty of demonstrating BE and a need for clinical trials with larger subject sample sizes, especially for medium-to-high variability drugs. To address this challenge, a scaled average BE based on the reference product within-subject variability for narrowing the acceptance range of NTI drugs was recently proposed. However, this approach showed increased type I error (T1E), especially close to the cut-off point between the unscaled and scaled portions of the method. Based on simulations, this limitation can be overcome by predefining the protocol the path to be followed: either the fixed 90.00-111.11% acceptance range approach or the previously proposed scaled average BE approach with a slight adjustment of the one-sided significance level α to 0.042 for a 2 × 3 × 3 partial replicate design and without a lower cut-off point. This results in a mixed approach allowing to reduce the sample size whilst not inflating the T1E.

Indexed as

bioequivalencegeneric medicinal productsmedicines regulationnarrow therapeutic index drugs

Identifiers

PMID38794260
PMCPMC11125232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.