ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improving the Concrete Crack Detection Process via a Hybrid Visual Transformer Algorithm.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of building structural reinforcement performance by internet of things and UAV sensing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid approach based on deep feature extraction and machine learning classification for structural damage detection in concrete structures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Smart City Infrastructure Monitoring with a Hybrid Vision Transformer for Micro-Crack Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Structural Component Identification and Damage Localization of Civil Infrastructure Using Semantic Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of an Automated Crack Detection System for Port Quay Walls Using a Small General-Purpose Drone and Orthophotos.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Metric Learning-Based Classification for Pavement Distress Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhance the Concrete Crack Classification Based on a Novel Multi-Stage YOLOV10-ViT Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Concrete Surface Crack Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLOv8.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inspections of concrete bridges across the United States represent a significant commitment of resources, given their biannual mandate for many structures. With a notable number of aging bridges, there is an imperative need to enhance the efficiency of these inspections. This study harnessed the power of computer vision to streamline the inspection process. Our experiment examined the efficacy of a state-of-the-art Visual Transformer (ViT) model combined with distinct image enhancement detector algorithms. We benchmarked against a deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model. These models were applied to over 20,000 high-quality images from the Concrete Images for Classification dataset. Traditional crack detection methods often fall short due to their heavy reliance on time and resources. This research pioneers bridge inspection by integrating ViT with diverse image enhancement detectors, significantly improving concrete crack detection accuracy. Notably, a custom-built CNN achieves over 99% accuracy with substantially lower training time than ViT, making it an efficient solution for enhancing safety and resource conservation in infrastructure management. These advancements enhance safety by enabling reliable detection and timely maintenance, but they also align with Industry 4.0 objectives, automating manual inspections, reducing costs, and advancing technological integration in public infrastructure management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.