Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38794098›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

RI2AP: Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction in Assembly Pipelines.

Chathurangi Shyalika, Kaushik Roy, Renjith Prasad, Fadi El Kalach, Yuxin Zi, Priya Mittal, Vignesh Narayanan, Ramy Harik, Amit Sheth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chathurangi ShyalikaArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-5566
Kaushik RoyArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6610-7845
Renjith PrasadArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-0362-5844
Fadi El KalachMcNair Center for Aerospace Innovation and Research, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1189-0291
Yuxin ZiArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-9694-1359
Priya MittalArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Vignesh NarayananArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Ramy HarikMcNair Center for Aerospace Innovation and Research, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1452-9653
Amit ShethArtificial Intelligence Institute, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0021-5293

Funding

National Science Foundation 2119654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting anomalies in manufacturing assembly lines is crucial for reducing time and labor costs and improving processes. For instance, in rocket assembly, premature part failures can lead to significant financial losses and labor inefficiencies. With the abundance of sensor data in the Industry 4.0 era, machine learning (ML) offers potential for early anomaly detection. However, current ML methods for anomaly prediction have limitations, with F1 measure scores of only 50% and 66% for prediction and detection, respectively. This is due to challenges like the rarity of anomalous events, scarcity of high-fidelity simulation data (actual data are expensive), and the complex relationships between anomalies not easily captured using traditional ML approaches. Specifically, these challenges relate to two dimensions of anomaly prediction: predicting when anomalies will occur and understanding the dependencies between them. This paper introduces a new method called Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction (RI2AP) designed to address both dimensions effectively. RI2AP is demonstrated on a rocket assembly simulation, showing up to a 30-point improvement in F1 measure compared to current ML methods. This highlights its potential to enhance automated anomaly prediction in manufacturing. Additionally, RI2AP includes a novel interpretation mechanism inspired by a causal-influence framework, providing domain experts with valuable insights into sensor readings and their impact on predictions. Finally, the RI2AP model was deployed in a real manufacturing setting for assembling rocket parts. Results and insights from this deployment demonstrate the promise of RI2AP for anomaly prediction in manufacturing assembly pipelines.

Indexed as

anomaly predictionassembly processessensor datasmart manufacturingtime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID38794098
PMCPMC11125630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.