Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38793966›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluating the Non-Invasive Measurement of Apple Aroma Using Electronic Nose Device through Comparison with Direct Mass Spectrometry, Sugar Content, and Ripeness Measurements.

Kouki Fujioka

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kouki FujiokaResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), 2-14-1 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9472-2922

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20K05900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare apple aroma intensities, apples were analyzed from the calyx side (on the opposite side of the stem) using an electronic nose (e-nose) sensor device and direct mass spectrometry. The results indicated that the sensor value tended to increase in accordance with the total intensity of apple aroma components measured by direct mass spectrometry. In addition, the e-nose sensor values for apple aroma did not correlate with the sugar content and ripeness measurements using optical sensors. Moreover, the relative standard deviations of repeatability and intermediate precision in the measurement of apple flavor (apple lip balm) were within 1.36-9.96%. Similar to the utilization of sugar content and ripeness values, the aroma measured from the calyx side can be potentially used for apple evaluation.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseMalusMass SpectrometryOdorantsSugarsSugarsapplearomadirect mass spectrometrye-nose

Identifiers

PMID38793966
PMCPMC11124816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.