Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38793928›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automated Vibroacoustic Monitoring of Trees for Borer Infestation.

Ilyas Potamitis, Iraklis Rigakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilyas PotamitisDepartment of Music Technology & Acoustics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 741 33 Rethymno, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7111-3331
Iraklis RigakisDepartment of Electronics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 731 33 Chania, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In previous research, we presented an apparatus designed for comprehensive and systematic surveillance of trees against borers. This apparatus entailed the insertion of an uncoated waveguide into the tree trunk, enabling the transmission of micro-vibrations generated by moving or digging larvae to a piezoelectric probe. Subsequent recordings were then transmitted at predetermined intervals to a server, where analysis was conducted manually to assess the infestation status of the tree. However, this method is hampered by significant limitations when scaling to monitor thousands of trees across extensive spatial domains. In this study, we address this challenge by integrating signal processing techniques capable of distinguishing vibrations attributable to borers from those originating externally to the tree. Our primary innovation involves quantifying the impulses resulting from the fracturing of wood fibers due to borer activity. The device employs criteria such as impulse duration and a strategy of waiting for periods of relative quietness before commencing the counting of impulses. Additionally, we provide an annotated large-scale database comprising laboratory and field vibrational recordings, which will facilitate further advancements in this research domain.

Indexed as

TreesVibrationAcousticsAnimalsLarvaSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAIbiodiversityinvasive pestsIoTsensorssignal processingvibrationswoodboring insects

Identifiers

PMID38793928
PMCPMC11125057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.