ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Sensorized 3D-Printed Knee Test Rig for Preliminary Experimental Validation of Patellar Tracking and Contact Simulation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting patellar kinematics and contact forces after TKA: a simulation study on quadriceps malalignment.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Use of patellofemoral digital twins for patellar tracking and treatment prediction: comparison of 3D models and contact detection algorithms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental validation of computational simulations is important because it provides empirical evidence to verify the accuracy and reliability of the simulated results. This validation ensures that the simulation accurately represents real-world phenomena, increasing confidence in the model's predictive capabilities and its applicability to practical scenarios. The use of musculoskeletal models in orthopedic surgery allows for objective prediction of postoperative function and optimization of results for each patient. To ensure that simulations are trustworthy and can be used for predictive purposes, comparing simulation results with experimental data is crucial. Although progress has been made in obtaining 3D bone geometry and estimating contact forces, validation of these predictions has been limited due to the lack of direct in vivo measurements and the economic and ethical constraints associated with available alternatives. In this study, an existing commercial surgical training station was transformed into a sensorized test bench to replicate a knee subject to a total knee replacement. The original knee inserts of the training station were replaced with personalized 3D-printed bones incorporating their corresponding implants, and multiple sensors with their respective supports were added. The recorded movement of the patella was used in combination with the forces recorded by the pressure sensor and the load cells, to validate the results obtained from the simulation, which was performed by means of a multibody dynamics formulation implemented in a custom-developed library. The utilization of 3D-printed models and sensors facilitated cost-effective and replicable experimental validation of computational simulations, thereby advancing orthopedic surgery while circumventing ethical concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.