Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38793852›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Investigation of Automotive LiDAR Vision in Rain from Material and Optical Perspectives.

Wing Yi Pao, Joshua Howorth, Long Li, Martin Agelin-Chaab, Langis Roy, Julian Knutzen, Alexis Baltazar-Y-Jimenez, Klaus Muenker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wing Yi PaoFaculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6132-1412
Joshua HoworthFaculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Long LiFaculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-5898-8628
Martin Agelin-ChaabFaculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-768X
Langis RoyFaculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Julian KnutzenMagna International, Aurora, ON L4G 7L6, Canada.
Alexis Baltazar-Y-JimenezMagna Exteriors, Troy, MI 48098, USA.
Klaus MuenkerMagna Exteriors, 63877 Sailauf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of autonomous functions in road vehicles, there has been increased use of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems comprising various sensors to perform automated tasks. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is one of the most important types of optical sensor, detecting the positions of obstacles by representing them as clusters of points in three-dimensional space. LiDAR performance degrades significantly when a vehicle is driving in the rain as raindrops adhere to the outer surface of the sensor assembly. Performance degradation behaviors include missing points and reduced reflectivity of the points. It was found that the extent of degradation is highly dependent on the interface material properties. This subsequently affects the shapes of the adherent droplets, causing different perturbations to the optical rays. A fundamental investigation is performed on the protective polycarbonate cover of a LiDAR assembly coated with four classes of material-hydrophilic, almost-hydrophobic, hydrophobic, and superhydrophobic. Water droplets are controllably dispensed onto the cover to quantify the signal alteration due to the different droplets of various sizes and shapes. To further understand the effects of droplet motion on LiDAR signals, sliding droplet conditions are simulated using numerical analysis. The results are validated with physical optical tests, using a 905 nm laser source and receiver to mimic the LiDAR detection mechanism. Comprehensive explanations of LiDAR performance degradation in rain are presented from both material and optical perspectives. These can aid component selection and the development of signal-enhancing strategies for the integration of LiDARs into vehicle designs to minimize the impact of rain.

Indexed as

adverse weatherautonomous vehiclecoatingLiDARoptical analysisrainsurface wettability

Identifiers

PMID38793852
PMCPMC11124791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.