ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Optimal Preparation and Performance Study of Eco-Friendly Composite Chemical Dust Suppressants: A Case Study in a Construction Site in Chengdu.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of a multi-functional dust suppressant synthesized from Sapindus mukorossi extract and bentonite clay.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance evaluation and application of second-generation environmentally-friendly composite dust suppressant in dust control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To mitigate dust pollution generated during various stages of construction activities and reduce the environmental and health hazards posed by airborne dust, this study utilized hydroxyethyl cellulose, glycerol, and isomeric tridecyl alcohol polyoxyethylene ether as raw materials to formulate a composite chemical dust suppressant. The properties of the dust suppressant were characterized through analysis. Employing single-factor experiments, the optimal proportions of the binder, water-retaining agent, and surfactant for the composite dust suppressant were determined. Subsequently, a response surface model was established, and, after analysis and optimization, the optimal mass ratios of each component in the composite dust suppressant were obtained. Under optimal ratios, the physicochemical properties and wind erosion resistance of the composite dust suppressant were analyzed. Finally, the practical application of the suppressant was validated through on-site trials at a construction site. This study revealed that the optimal formulation for the dust suppressant was as follows: 0.2% hydroxyethyl cellulose, 2.097% glycerol, 0.693% isomeric tridecyl alcohol polyoxyethylene ether, and the remainder was pure water. The suppressant is non-toxic, non-corrosive, environmentally friendly, and exhibits excellent moisture retention and bonding properties compared to water. The research findings provide valuable insights for addressing dust pollution issues on construction sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.