Carbon-Based Composites for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts: Design, Fabrication, and Application.

Chang Gao, Haiyu Yao, Peijie Wang, Min Zhu, Xue-Rong Shi, Shusheng Xu

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chang GaoSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.

Haiyu YaoSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.

Peijie WangSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.

Min ZhuSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.

Xue-Rong ShiSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.

Shusheng XuSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-6557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The four-electron oxidation process of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) highly influences the performance of many green energy storage and conversion devices due to its sluggish kinetics. The fabrication of cost-effective OER electrocatalysts via a facile and green method is, hence, highly desirable. This review summarizes and discusses the recent progress in creating carbon-based materials for alkaline OER. The contents mainly focus on the design, fabrication, and application of carbon-based materials for alkaline OER, including metal-free carbon materials, carbon-based supported composites, and carbon-based material core-shell hybrids. The work presents references and suggestions for the rational design of highly efficient carbon-based OER materials.

Indexed as

carbon-based materialscore–shellmetal-freeoxygen evolution reactionrational designsupport

Identifiers

PMID38793344

DOI10.3390/ma17102265

PMCPMC11122737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.