ArticleMicromachines2024
Capillary Force-Driven Quantitative Plasma Separation Method for Application of Whole Blood Detection Microfluidic Chip.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Microfluidic Plasma Separation Technologies for Point-of-Care Diagnostics: Moving Beyond Conventional Centrifugation.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Handheld Lab-on-a-Chip System for Label-Free Dual-Plex Detection of Biomarkers Through On-Chip Plasma Separation.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Parylene-C Modified OSTE Molds for PDMS Microfluidic Chip Fabrication and Applications in Plasma Separation and Polymorphic Crystallization.Biosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Separating plasma or serum from blood is essential for precise testing. However, extracting precise plasma quantities outside the laboratory poses challenges. A recent study has introduced a capillary force-driven membrane filtration technique to accurately separate small plasma volumes. This method efficiently isolates 100-200 μL of pure human whole blood with a 48% hematocrit, resulting in 5-30 μL of plasma with less than a 10% margin of error. The entire process is completed within 20 min, offering a simple and cost-effective approach to blood separation. This study has successfully addressed the bottleneck in self-service POCT, ensuring testing accuracy. This innovative method shows promise for clinical diagnostics and point-of-care testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.