Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38793127›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Automatic Classification and Visualization of Text Data on Rare Diseases.

Luis Rei, Joao Pita Costa, Tanja Zdolšek Draksler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis ReiJožef Stefan Institute (IJS), Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-1638
Joao Pita CostaInternational Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence under the Auspices of UNESCO (IRCAI), Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-1302
Tanja Zdolšek DrakslerJožef Stefan Institute (IJS), Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-6275

Funding

European Commission 727721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 7000 rare diseases affect over 400 million people, posing significant challenges for medical research and healthcare. The integration of precision medicine with artificial intelligence offers promising solutions. This work introduces a classifier developed to discern whether research and news articles pertain to rare or non-rare diseases. Our methodology involves extracting 709 rare disease MeSH terms from Mondo and MeSH to improve rare disease categorization. We evaluate our classifier on abstracts from PubMed/MEDLINE and an expert-annotated news dataset, which includes news articles on four selected rare neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)-considered the largest category of rare diseases-from a total of 16 analyzed. We achieved F1 scores of 85% for abstracts and 71% for news articles, demonstrating robustness across both datasets and highlighting the potential of integrating artificial intelligence and ontologies to improve disease classification. Although the results are promising, they also indicate the need for further refinement in managing data heterogeneity. Our classifier improves the identification and categorization of medical information, essential for advancing research, enhancing information access, influencing policy, and supporting personalized treatments. Future work will focus on expanding disease classification to distinguish between attributes such as infectious and hereditary diseases, addressing data heterogeneity, and incorporating multilingual capabilities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehealthcareMEDLINE miningMeSH headingsrare diseasessemantic technologiestext miningworldwide news

Identifiers

PMID38793127
PMCPMC11121901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.