Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38792976›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC: Updates on Clinical Features and Genetic Mutations for Latest Recommendations.

Gennaro D'Orsi, Martina Giacalone, Alessio Calicchia, Elettra Gagliano, Lisa Vannucchi, Gianluca Vanni, Oreste Claudio Buonomo, Valerio Cervelli, Benedetto Longo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Late-OnsetCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gennaro D'OrsiPhD School of Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Martina GiacalonePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Alessio CalicchiaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Elettra GaglianoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Lisa VannucchiPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Gianluca VanniDivision of Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Oreste Claudio BuonomoDivision of Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Valerio CervelliPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Benedetto LongoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-0609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and Breast Implant-Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (BIA-SCC) are emerging neoplastic complications related to breast implants. While BIA-ALCL is often linked to macrotextured implants, current evidence does not suggest an implant-type association for BIA-SCC. Chronic inflammation and genetics have been hypothesized as key pathogenetic players, although for both conditions, the exact mechanisms and specific risks related to breast implants are yet to be established. While the genetic alterations in BIA-SCC are still unknown, JAK-STAT pathway activation has been outlined as a dominant signature of BIA-ALCL. Recent genetic investigation has uncovered various molecular players, including MEK-ERK, PI3K/AKT, CDK4-6, and PDL1. The clinical presentation of BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC overlaps, including most commonly late seroma and breast swelling, warranting ultrasound and cytological examinations, which are the first recommended steps as part of the diagnostic work-up. While the role of mammography is still limited, MRI and CT-PET are recommended according to the clinical presentation and for disease staging. To date, the mainstay of treatment for BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC is implant removal with en-bloc capsulectomy. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have also been used for advanced-stage BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC. In-depth characterization of the tumor genetics is key for the development of novel therapeutic strategies, especially for advanced stage BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC, which show a more aggressive course and poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticMutationFemaleHumansBIA-ALCLBIA-SCCbreast implantsbreast reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID38792976
PMCPMC11122735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.