Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38792941›Full record

SynthesisMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life.

Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Federico Piramide, Karl H Pang, Emil Durukan, Lazaros Tzelves, Anna Ricapito, Loic Baekelandt, Enrico Checcucci, Diego M Carrion, Carlo Bettocchi and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Federico PiramideDepartment of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy.
Karl H PangAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-2319
Emil DurukanDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-8944
Lazaros TzelvesSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-9783
Anna RicapitoDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-8747
Loic BaekelandtDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8962-9395
Enrico CheccucciDepartment of Surgery, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, 10060 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7901-5608
Diego M CarrionDepartment of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, 28850 Madrid, Spain.
Carlo BettocchiDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Francesco EspertoDepartment of Urology, Campus Biomedico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-1864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in practices related to enhancing penile size can be attributed to the belief that an improved genital appearance contributes to a man's virility, coupled with an altered self-perception of his body. It is crucial to tailor interventions to meet the genuine needs of patients by thoroughly assessing their history, psychological state, and potential surgical benefits, all while considering the associated risks of complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on outcomes, complications, and quality of life after penile augmentation surgery, examining both minimally invasive and more radical techniques. A search of the PubMed and Scopus databases, focusing on English-language papers published in the last 15 years, was performed in December 2023. Papers discussing surgery in animal models and case reports were excluded from the present study unless further evaluated in a follow-up case series. The primary outcomes were changes in penile dimensions, specifically in terms of length and girth, as well as the incidence of surgical complications and the impact on quality of life. A total of 1670 articles were retrieved from the search and 46 were included for analysis. Procedures for penile length perceived enhancements include lipoplasty, skin reconstruction plasty, V-Y and Z plasty, flap reconstruction, scrotoplasty, ventral phalloplasty, and suspensory ligament release; techniques for increasing corporal penile length include penile disassembly, total phalloplasty, and sliding elongation. Finally, penile girth enhancement may be performed using soft tissue fillers, grafting procedures, biodegradable scaffolds, and Penuma

Indexed as

PenisQuality of LifeHumansMalePlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment Outcomepenile augmentationpenile enlargementsurgical techniques

Identifiers

PMID38792941
PMCPMC11123079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.