ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024
The Effects of Dobutamine in Septic Shock: An Updated Narrative Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Cardiogenic Shock in the Emergency Setting.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Advancing Microcirculatory Therapies in Pediatric Sepsis: Current Opportunities and Future Directions.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Response to Dobutamine in Septic Shock With Myocardial Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Hidden effects of dobutamine on cardiac output.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Anesthetic management and complications during transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers and Phoenix criteria in pediatric sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Difficult Definition, Challenging Diagnosis, Unclear Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Quantitative assessment of the usability of electromechanical human-based modelling and simulation to replace Langendorff isolated rabbit heart experiments in the preclinical setting.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Levosimendan versus dobutamine in septic cardiomyopathy: a randomized clinical trial on cardiac function and safety.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Pathogenesis and treatment strategies of sepsis-induced myocardial injury: modern and traditional medical perspectives.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The key objective in the hemodynamic treatment of septic shock is the optimization of tissue perfusion and oxygenation. This is usually achieved by the utilization of fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes. Dobutamine is the inotrope most commonly recommended and used for this purpose. Despite the fact that dobutamine was introduced almost half a century ago in the treatment of septic shock, and there is widespread use of the drug, several aspects of its pharmacodynamics remain poorly understood. In normal subjects, dobutamine increases contractility and lacks a direct effect on vascular tone. This results in augmented cardiac output and blood pressure, with reflex reduction in systemic vascular resistance. In septic shock, some experimental and clinical research suggest beneficial effects on systemic and regional perfusion. Nevertheless, other studies found heterogeneous and unpredictable effects with frequent side effects. In this narrative review, we discuss the pharmacodynamic characteristics of dobutamine and its physiologic actions in different settings, with special reference to septic shock. We discuss studies showing that dobutamine frequently induces tachycardia and vasodilation, without positive actions on contractility. Since untoward effects are often found and therapeutic benefits are occasional, its profile of efficacy and safety seems low. Therefore, we recommend that the use of dobutamine in septic shock should be cautious. Before a final decision about its prescription, efficacy, and tolerance should be evaluated throughout a short period with narrow monitoring of its wanted and side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.