Disease Control and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Japan.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Clinical phenotypes and molecular endotypes of chronic urticaria: Linking clinical expression to underlying immune mechanisms.Asia Pacific allergy · 2026
   Review
2. Remibrutinib Showed a Favorable Safety Profile and Sustained Efficacy in Japanese Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Over 52 Weeks.Dermatology and therapy · 2026
   Article
3. Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Current Management of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Japan: Retrospective Claims Database Study.The Journal of dermatology · 2025
   Observational
4. Urticaria Voices: Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Dermatology and therapy · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as