ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Advances in Microvascular Reconstruction of the Orbit and Beyond: Considerations and a Checklist for Decision-Making.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The "Pacman Flap with Tongue" for Secondary Orbital Reconstruction in Osteoradionecrosis: A Case Series.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to discuss the microvascular reconstruction of the orbit and adjacent regions and to propose a checklist to aid the reconstructive surgeon in this challenging undertaking. The discussion is based on a literature review that includes 32 retrospective case series, 5 case reports published in the last 34 years in PubMed, and 3 textbook chapters. Additionally, it relies on the senior author's expertise, described in a case series, and two case reports published elsewhere. Classifications and treatment algorithms on microvascular orbit reconstruction generally disregard patient-related factors. A more holistic approach can be advantageous: patient-related factors, such as age, comorbidities, prognosis, previous interventions, radiotherapy, and the wish for maximal dental rehabilitation and a prosthetic eye, have the same importance as defect-related considerations and can inform the choice of a reconstructive option. In this manuscript, we examine defect- and patient-related factors and new technologies, provide a checklist, and examine future directions. The checklist is intended as a tool to aid in the decision-making process when reconstructing the orbital region with microvascular flaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.