Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38792418›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Contemporary Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Emerging Techniques and Trends.

Kaylyn Pogson-Morowitz, Denisse Porras Fimbres, Brooke E Barrow, Nicholas C Oleck, Ash Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical outcomes in abdominal wall autologous flap reconstruction: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaylyn Pogson-MorowitzDivision of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Denisse Porras FimbresDivision of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Brooke E BarrowDivision of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0517-9890
Nicholas C OleckDivision of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Ash PatelDivision of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8384-190X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common and necessary surgery, two factors that drive innovation. This review article examines recent developments in ventral hernia repair including primary fascial closure, mesh selection between biologic, permanent synthetic, and biosynthetic meshes, component separation, and functional abdominal wall reconstruction from a plastic surgery perspective, exploring the full range of hernia repair's own reconstructive ladder. New materials and techniques are examined to explore the ever-increasing options available to surgeons who work within the sphere of ventral hernia repair and provide updates for evolving trends in the field.

Indexed as

abdominal wall reconstructionbiologic meshcomponent separationfunctional abdominal wall reconstructionmesh stripspermanent synthetic meshprimary fascial closureventral hernia repair

Identifiers

PMID38792418
PMCPMC11122627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.