ArticleCancers2024
Identification of Gene Expression in Different Stages of Breast Cancer with Machine Learning.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stage analysis of gastric cancer: a bioinformatic approach.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2026Article
- Advanced machine learning framework for enhancing breast cancer diagnostics through transcriptomic profiling.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining the tumor origin in humans is vital in clinical applications of molecular diagnostics. Metastatic cancer is usually a very aggressive disease with limited diagnostic procedures, despite the fact that many protocols have been evaluated for their effectiveness in prognostication. Research has shown that dysregulation in miRNAs (a class of non-coding, regulatory RNAs) is remarkably involved in oncogenic conditions. This research paper aims to develop a machine learning model that processes an array of miRNAs in 1097 metastatic tissue samples from patients who suffered from various stages of breast cancer. The suggested machine learning model is fed with miRNA quantitative read count data taken from The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Repository. Two main feature-selection techniques have been used, mainly Neighborhood Component Analysis and Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance, to identify the most discriminant and relevant miRNAs for their up-regulated and down-regulated states. These miRNAs are then validated as biological identifiers for each of the four cancer stages in breast tumors. Both machine learning algorithms yield performance scores that are significantly higher than the traditional fold-change approach, particularly in earlier stages of cancer, with Neighborhood Component Analysis and Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance achieving accuracy scores of up to 0.983 and 0.931, respectively, compared to 0.920 for the FC method. This study underscores the potential of advanced feature-selection methods in enhancing the accuracy of cancer stage identification, paving the way for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.