Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38791802›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Medical Interpreting Services for Refugees in Canada: Current State of Practice and Considerations in Promoting this Essential Human Right for All.

Akshaya Neil Arya, Ilene Hyman, Tim Holland, Carolyn Beukeboom, Catherine E Tong, Rachel Talavlikar, Grace Eagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Experiences of culturally Deaf people with health care access and navigation in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative co-design study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akshaya Neil AryaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 3L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9524-1146
Ilene HymanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Tim HollandDepartment of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-5657-9958
Carolyn BeukeboomKitchener-Waterloo Centre for Family Medicine Refugee Health Clinic, Kitchener, ON N2G 1C5, Canada.
Catherine E TongSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Rachel TalavlikarDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T3H 0N9, Canada.
Grace EaganLanguage Services & Digital Strategy, Access Alliance Multicultural Health & Community Services, Toronto, ON M5T 3A9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language barriers, specifically among refugees, pose significant challenges to delivering quality healthcare in Canada. While the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the emergence and development of innovative alternatives such as telephone-based and video-conferencing medical interpreting services and AI tools, access remains uneven across Canada. This comprehensive analysis highlights the absence of a cohesive national strategy, reflected in diverse funding models employed across provinces and territories, with gaps and disparities in access to medical interpreting services. Advocating for medical interpreting, both as a moral imperative and a prudent investment, this article draws from human rights principles and ethical considerations, justified in national and international guidelines, charters, codes and regulations. Substantiated by a cost-benefit analysis, it emphasizes that medical interpreting enhances healthcare quality and preserves patient autonomy. Additionally, this article illuminates decision-making processes for utilizing interpreting services; recognizing the pivotal roles of clinicians, interpreters, patients and caregivers within the care circle; appreciating intersectional considerations such as gender, culture and age, underscoring the importance of a collaborative approach. Finally, it provides recommendations at provider, organizational and system levels to ensure equitable access to this right and to promote the health and well-being of refugees and other individuals facing language barriers within Canada's healthcare system.

Indexed as

COVID-19Human RightsRefugeesCanadaCommunication BarriersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansSARS-CoV-2TranslatingCanadahealthcare standardshuman rights for alllanguage barriersmedical ethicsmedical interpretation/interpretingnewcomersrefugees

Identifiers

PMID38791802
PMCPMC11121150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.