Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38791801›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Effects on Child Development and Parent-Child Interaction of the FACAM Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Study of an Interdisciplinary Intervention to Support Women in Vulnerable Positions through Pregnancy and Early Motherhood.

Maiken Pontoppidan, Lene Nygaard, Jonas Cuzulan Hirani, Mette Thorsager, Mette Friis-Hansen, Deborah Davis, Ellen Aagaard Nohr

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maiken PontoppidanVIVE-The Danish Centre for Social Science Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-3665
Lene NygaardResearch Unit for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8516-7365
Jonas Cuzulan HiraniVIVE-The Danish Centre for Social Science Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette ThorsagerVIVE-The Danish Centre for Social Science Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette Friis-HansenVIVE-The Danish Centre for Social Science Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Deborah DavisFaculty of Health, University of Canberra and ACT Health, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Ellen Aagaard NohrResearch Unit for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7039-1105

Funding

A P Møllerske Støttefond 11678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health inequality can have a profound impact on a child's life. Maternal mental health challenges can hinder bonding, leading to impaired functioning and poorer child outcomes. To provide extra support for vulnerable pregnant women, the FACAM intervention offers the services of a health nurse or family therapist from pregnancy until the child starts school. This study examined the effects of FACAM intervention on pregnant women in vulnerable positions and their children until the child turned two years old. We randomly assigned 331 pregnant women to either FACAM intervention or care as usual and assessed them at baseline and when the infant was 3-6, 12-13.5, and 24 months old. The primary outcome was maternal sensitivity measured by Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB). Secondary outcomes included the parent-child relationship, child social-emotional development, child developmental progress, parent-child interaction, and child development. Our findings indicate that care-as-usual children were significantly more involved than FACAM children when the child was 4-6 months old (b = -0.25, [-0.42; -0.08] d = -0.42). However, we suspect this result is due to a biased dropout. We did not find any significant differences in any other outcomes. Therefore, the study suggests that the FACAM intervention is not superior to care as usual regarding child development and parent-child interaction outcomes.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentParent-Child RelationsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMothersPregnancyVulnerable Populationsdisadvantaged populationsearly interventionfamilyinfantmental healthmothermultidisciplinaryparentingpregnantrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38791801
PMCPMC11121224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.