Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38791689›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Preweaning Purified Fucoidan Drench: Effects on Growth, Immune Response, and Intestinal Morphology in Weaned Piglets.

Bonnie Homer, Reza Barekatain, Kiro R Petrovski, Kate J Plush, Corinna Dwan, Darryl N D'Souza, Paul J Verma, Roy N Kirkwood, Bryony S Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bonnie HomerSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-3694-4155
Reza BarekatainSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-0881
Kiro R PetrovskiSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4016-2576
Kate J PlushSunPork Group, Eagle Farm, QLD 4009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0322-7115
Corinna DwanMarinova Pty Ltd., 249 Kennedy Drive, Cambridge, TAS 7170, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-0743
Darryl N D'SouzaSunPork Group, Eagle Farm, QLD 4009, Australia.
Paul J VermaSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
Roy N KirkwoodSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-8301
Bryony S TuckerSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2026-2070

Funding

Marine Bioproducts CRC MBCRC314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning stress imposes considerable physiological challenges on piglets, often manifesting in intestinal disturbances, such as inflammation and compromised barrier function, ultimately affecting growth and health outcomes. While conventional interventions, including antimicrobials, have effectively mitigated these sequelae, concerns surrounding antimicrobial resistance necessitate the exploration of alternatives. Fucoidan, derived from brown seaweed, offers promise due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Previous research has been limited to the in-feed supplementation of partially purified fucoidan extracted from brown seaweed. The focus of the present study is assessing the effect of a preweaning drench with highly purified (85%) fucoidan on piglet growth, immune response, and intestinal morphology post-weaning. Forty-eight male piglets at 17 ± 3 days of age (5.67 ± 0.16 kg) were assigned to a saline (control), fucoidan, or antimicrobial group, receiving treatment as a single 18 mL oral drench three days before weaning. Monitoring for seven days post-weaning included body weight measurements, blood sample collection for the inflammatory protein assay, and small intestine morphological analysis. The findings revealed that the preweaning fucoidan drench did not elicit adverse effects on piglets. However, neither fucoidan nor antimicrobial drenches significantly enhanced growth parameters, immune markers, or intestinal morphology compared to that of the control-treated piglets (

Indexed as

fucoidangastrointestinal healthinflammationpigletsweaning

Identifiers

PMID38791689
PMCPMC11117201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.