ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Nano(bio)Materials Do Not Affect Macrophage Phenotype-A Study Conducted by the REFINE Project.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages (iMacs) in translational medicine: Disease models, drug testing, and therapeutic applications.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophages are well known for their involvement in the biocompatibility, as well as biodistribution, of nano(bio)materials. Although there are a number of rodent cell lines, they may not fully recapitulate primary cell responses, particularly those of human cells. Isolation of tissue-resident macrophages from humans is difficult and may result in insufficient cells with which to determine the possible interaction with nano(bio)materials. Isolation of primary human monocytes and differentiation to monocyte-derived macrophages may provide a useful tool with which to further study these interactions. To that end, we developed a standard operating procedure for this differentiation, as part of the Regulatory Science Framework for Nano(bio)material-based Medical Products and Devices (REFINE) project, and used it to measure the secretion of bioactive molecules from M1 and M2 differentiated monocytes in response to model nano(bio)materials, following an initial assessment of pyrogenic contamination, which may confound potential observations. The SOP was deployed in two partner institutions with broadly similar results. The work presented here shows the utility of this assay but highlights the relevance of donor variability in responses to nano(bio)materials. Whilst donor variability can provide some logistical challenges to the application of such assays, this variability is much closer to the heterogeneous cells that are present in vivo, compared to homogeneous non-human cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.