Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38791287›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Improving AlphaFold Predicted Contacts for Alpha-Helical Transmembrane Proteins Using Structural Features.

Aman Sawhney, Jiefu Li, Li Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aman SawhneyDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Smith Hall, 18 Amstel Avenue, Newark, DE 19716, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5285-4671
Jiefu LiSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jun Gong Road, Shanghai 200093, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-8142
Li LiaoDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Smith Hall, 18 Amstel Avenue, Newark, DE 19716, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-1879

Funding

Predictive Modeling & Optimal Control Framework for Model-Based Epidemic Response in DelawareP20GM103446 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI MELINDA K DUNCAN · 2012 to 2026
$67.2M
National Science Foundation NSF-MCB1820103NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residue contact maps provide a condensed two-dimensional representation of three-dimensional protein structures, serving as a foundational framework in structural modeling but also as an effective tool in their own right in identifying inter-helical binding sites and drawing insights about protein function. Treating contact maps primarily as an intermediate step for 3D structure prediction, contact prediction methods have limited themselves exclusively to sequential features. Now that AlphaFold2 predicts 3D structures with good accuracy in general, we examine (1) how well predicted 3D structures can be directly used for deciding residue contacts, and (2) whether features from 3D structures can be leveraged to further improve residue contact prediction. With a well-known benchmark dataset, we tested predicting inter-helical residue contact based on AlphaFold2's predicted structures, which gave an 83% average precision, already outperforming a sequential features-based state-of-the-art model. We then developed a procedure to extract features from atomic structure in the neighborhood of a residue pair, hypothesizing that these features will be useful in determining if the residue pair is in contact, provided the structure is decently accurate, such as predicted by AlphaFold2. Training on features generated from experimentally determined structures, we leveraged knowledge from known structures to significantly improve residue contact prediction, when testing using the same set of features but derived using AlphaFold2 structures. Our results demonstrate a remarkable improvement over AlphaFold2, achieving over 91.9% average precision for a held-out subset and over 89.5% average precision in cross-validation experiments.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsModels, MolecularBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein FoldingMembrane ProteinsAlphaFoldAlpha helixcontact map predictionmachine learningneural networksprotein structureprotein structure modelingtransmembrane proteins

Identifiers

PMID38791287
PMCPMC11121315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.