ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
The Species Effect: Differential Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Responses in the Bone in Human Versus Mouse.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptome Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes and Molecular Pathways Involved During Osteoclast Differentiation.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation Modulates Proliferation and Gene Expression Related to Calcium Signaling in Human Osteoblast Cells.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The deterioration of osteoblast-led bone formation and the upregulation of osteoclast-regulated bone resorption are the primary causes of bone diseases, including osteoporosis. Numerous circulating factors play a role in bone homeostasis by regulating osteoblast and osteoclast activity, including the sphingolipid-sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). However, to date no comprehensive studies have investigated the impact of S1P activity on human and murine osteoblasts and osteoclasts. We observed species-specific responses to S1P in both osteoblasts and osteoclasts, where S1P stimulated human osteoblast mineralisation and reduced human pre-osteoclast differentiation and mineral resorption, thereby favouring bone formation. The opposite was true for murine osteoblasts and osteoclasts, resulting in more mineral resorption and less mineral deposition. Species-specific differences in osteoblast responses to S1P were potentially explained by differential expression of S1P receptor 1. By contrast, human and murine osteoclasts expressed comparable levels of S1P receptors but showed differential expression patterns of the two sphingosine kinase enzymes responsible for S1P production. Ultimately, we reveal that murine models may not accurately represent how human bone cells will respond to S1P, and thus are not a suitable model for exploring S1P physiology or potential therapeutic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.