Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38791093›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study.

Fernando Meseguer, Carla Giménez Rodríguez, Rocío Rivera Egea, Laura Carrión Sisternas, Jose A Remohí, Marcos Meseguer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Increased reproductive outcomes after optimized sperm preparation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernando MeseguerIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7925-7874
Carla Giménez RodríguezIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Rocío Rivera EgeaIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.
Laura Carrión SisternasIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Jose A RemohíIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.
Marcos MeseguerIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

Eureka-Eurostars E!113740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The same sperm selection techniques in assisted reproduction clinics have remained largely unchanged despite their weaknesses. Recently, microfluidic devices have emerged as a novel methodology that facilitates the sperm selection process with promising results. A prospective case-control study was conducted in two phases: 100 samples were used to compare the microfluidic device with Density Gradient, and another 100 samples were used to compare the device with the Swim-up. In the initial phase, a significant enhancement in progressive motility, total progressive motile sperm count, vitality, morphology, and sperm DNA fragmentation were obtained for the microfluidic group compared to Density Gradient. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were observed in sperm concentration and chromatin structure stability. In the subsequent phase, the microfluidic group exhibited significant increases in sperm concentration, total progressive motile sperm count, and vitality compared to Swim-up. However, non-significant differences were seen for progressive motility, morphology, DNA structure stability, and DNA fragmentation. Similar trends were observed when results were stratified into quartiles. In conclusion, in a comparison of microfluidics with standard techniques, an improvement in sperm quality parameters was observed for the microfluidic group. However, this improvement was not significant for all parameters.

Indexed as

density gradientmicrofluidicssperm qualitysperm selectionswim-up

Identifiers

PMID38791093
PMCPMC11118748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.