ArticleBiomedicines2024
Exploring the Impact of Irradiation on Glioblastoma Blood-Brain-Barrier Permeability: Insights from Dynamic-Contrast-Enhanced-MRI and Histological Analysis.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming immune evasion with innovative multi-target approaches for glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Integrating computational fluid dynamics into organ-on-chip systems: a glioblastoma-centred design and validation framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Changes in perfusion and permeability in glioblastoma model induced by the anti-angiogenic agents cediranib and thalidomide.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Glioblastoma (GB) presents a formidable challenge in neuro-oncology due to its aggressive nature, limited treatment options, and poor prognosis. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) complicates treatment by hindering drug delivery to the tumor site, particularly to the infiltrative cells in the margin of the tumor, which are mainly responsible for tumor recurrence. Innovative strategies are therefore needed to enhance drug delivery in the margins of the tumor. This study explores whether irradiation can enhance BBB permeability by assessing hemodynamic changes and the distribution of contrast agents in the core and the margins of GB tumors. (2) Methods: Mice grafted with U-87MG cells were exposed to increasing irradiation doses. The distribution of contrast agents and hemodynamic parameters was evaluated using both non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques with gadolinium-DOTA as a contrast agent and invasive histological analysis with Evans blue, a fluorescent vascular leakage marker. Diffusion-MRI was also used to assess cytotoxic effects. (3) Results: The histological study revealed a complex dose-dependent effect of irradiation on BBB integrity, with increased vascular leakage at 5 Gy but reduced leakage at higher doses (10 and 15 Gy). However, there was no significant increase in the diffusion of Gd-DOTA outside the tumor area by MRI. (4) Conclusions: The increase in BBB permeability could be an interesting approach to enhance drug delivery in glioblastoma margins for low irradiation doses. In this model, DCE-MRI analysis was of limited value in assessing the BBB opening in glioblastoma after irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.