Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790854›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Novel Post-Harvest Preservation Techniques for Edible Fungi: A Review.

Yuping Cao, Li Wu, Qing Xia, Kexin Yi, Yibin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuping CaoCollege of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Li WuInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China.
Qing XiaCollege of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Kexin YiCollege of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Yibin LiInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9538-6484

Funding

"5511" collaborative innovation project of Fujian province and the Chinese Academy of Agricul-tural Sciences on the high-quality development and transcendence of agriculture XTCXGC2021014Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences YCZX202411, CXPT2023009, YC20210007, ZYTS202417 and CXTD2021018-2Fujian province modern edible fungus industry technology system construction project Mincaizhi [2019] No. 897Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology 2022R1032005, 2022R1032008, 2023J01201, 2023J01377, 2023R1030001, 2023R1099 and 2023R1100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edible fungi are well known for their rich nutrition and unique flavor. However, their post-harvest shelf-life is relatively short, and effective post-harvest preservation techniques are crucial for maintaining their quality. In recent years, many new technologies have been used for the preservation of edible fungi. These technologies include cold plasma treatment, electrostatic field treatment, active packaging, edible coatings, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, and genetic editing, among others. This paper reviews the new methods for post-harvest preservation of mainstream edible fungi. By comprehensively evaluating the relative advantages and limitations of these new technologies, their potential and challenges in practical applications are inferred. The paper also proposes directions and suggestions for the future development of edible fungi preservation, aiming to provide reference and guidance for improving the quality of edible fungi products and extending their shelf-life.

Indexed as

edible funginew technologiesnutraceutical valuepost-harvest preservation

Identifiers

PMID38790854
PMCPMC11120273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.