ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Plant-Based Meat Analogues in the Human Diet: What Are the Hazards?
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A review of the toxicological effects and allergenic potential of emerging alternative protein sources.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary Adjuvanticity in the Modern Plant Exposome: Implications for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Dual-Frequency Ultrasound-Assisted Glycation Modulates Beef Myofibrillar Protein Gels and Inhibits Lysinoalanine Formation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Food Safety and Nutritional Aspects of Plant-Based Dairy and Meat Alternatives: A Review.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Exploring the Impact of Lipid Structure and Composition on the Digestion of Next-Generation Meat and Dairy Analogues.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Plant-Based Analogs: Potential Chemical Risks & Mitigation Strategies.Journal of food science · 2025Review
- Pathogen and Spoilage Microorganisms in Meat and Dairy Analogues: Occurrence and Control Strategies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of aflatoxin contamination in protein-rich pulses using a GFP-expressingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The impact of consumer in-home cooking methods on the physicochemical, sensory, and nutritional attributes of plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) and meat: a review.Food production, processing and nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research regarding meat analogues is mostly based on formulation and process development. Information concerning their safety, shelf life, and long-term nutritional and health effects is limited. This article reviews the existing literature and analyzes potential hazards introduced or modified throughout the processing chain of plant-based meat analogues via extrusion processing, encompassing nutritional, microbiological, chemical, and allergen aspects. It was found that the nutritional value of plant-based raw materials and proteins extracted thereof increases along the processing chain. However, the nutritional value of plant-based meat analogues is lower than that of e.g., animal-based products. Consequently, higher quantities of these products might be needed to achieve a nutritional profile similar to e.g., meat. This could lead to an increased ingestion of undigestible proteins and dietary fiber. Although dietary fibers are known to have many positive health benefits, they present a hazard since their consumption at high concentrations might lead to gastrointestinal reactions. Even though there is plenty of ongoing research on this topic, it is still not clear how the sole absorption of metabolites derived from plant-based products compared with animal-based products ultimately affects human health. Allergens were identified as a hazard since plant-based proteins can induce an allergic reaction, are known to have cross-reactivities with other allergens and cannot be eliminated during the processing of meat analogues. Microbiological hazards, especially the occurrence of spore- and non-spore-forming bacteria, do not represent a particular case if requirements and regulations are met. Lastly, it was concluded that there are still many unknown variables and open questions regarding potential hazards possibly present in meat analogues, including processing-related compounds such as n-nitrosamines, acrylamide, and heterocyclic aromatic amino acids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.