Fundamental Stability Skills: Reliability Analysis Using the

Eva Santos-Miranda, Aida Carballo-Fazanes, Ezequiel Rey, Inés Piñeiro-García-Tuñón, Cristian Abelairas-Gómez

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva Santos-MirandaCLINURSID Research Group, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6334-0393

Aida Carballo-FazanesCLINURSID Research Group, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Ezequiel ReyREMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4770-2694

Inés Piñeiro-García-TuñónFaculty of Education Sciences, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Cristian Abelairas-GómezCLINURSID Research Group, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1056-7778

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-128640OB-I00

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundamental movement skills (FMS), considered as building blocks of movement, have received growing interest due to their significant impact on both present and future health. FMS are categorized into locomotor, object control and stability skills. While there has been extensive research on assessing the proficiency and reliability of locomotor and object control skills, stability skills have received comparatively less attention. For this reason, this study aimed to assess the test-retest, intrarater and interrater reliability of five stability skills included in the

Indexed as

agreementassessmentfundamental movement skillsinterrater reliabilityintrarater reliabilityratersstability skillstest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID38790579

DOI10.3390/children11050583

PMCPMC11119338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.