ArticleBrain sciences2024
Motor Imagery Classification Using Effective Channel Selection of Multichannel EEG.
Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Domain Feature Fusion and Channel Attention in an Inception-Based Architecture for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- EEG Feature Extraction and Classification for Upper Limb Flexion and Extension Motor Imagery Based on Discriminative Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Gaussian Connectivity-Driven EEG Imaging for Deep Learning-Based Motor Imagery Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- GAH-TNet: A Graph Attention-Based Hierarchical Temporal Network for EEG Motor Imagery Decoding.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of EEG Electrode Numbers on Source Estimation in Motor Imagery.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Performance Improvement with Reduced Number of Channels in Motor Imagery BCI System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transforming Motor Imagery Analysis: A Novel EEG Classification Framework Using AtSiftNet Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is effectively employed to describe cognitive patterns corresponding to different tasks of motor functions for brain-computer interface (BCI) implementation. Explicit information processing is necessary to reduce the computational complexity of practical BCI systems. This paper presents an entropy-based approach to select effective EEG channels for motor imagery (MI) classification in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. The method identifies channels with higher entropy scores, which is an indication of greater information content. It discards redundant or noisy channels leading to reduced computational complexity and improved classification accuracy. High entropy means a more disordered pattern, whereas low entropy means a less disordered pattern with less information. The entropy of each channel for individual trials is calculated. The weight of each channel is represented by the mean entropy of the channel over all the trials. A set of channels with higher mean entropy are selected as effective channels for MI classification. A limited number of sub-band signals are created by decomposing the selected channels. To extract the spatial features, the common spatial pattern (CSP) is applied to each sub-band space of EEG signals. The CSP-based features are used to classify the right-hand and right-foot MI tasks using a support vector machine (SVM). The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated using two publicly available EEG datasets, known as BCI competition III-IV(A) and BCI competition IV-I. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach surpasses cutting-edge techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.